Vulnerability Reporting¶
This guide outlines the process for reporting security vulnerabilities in the AIDDDMAP platform.
Reporting Process¶
1. Before Reporting¶
Scope¶
in_scope:
components:
- Core platform
- Official plugins
- Public APIs
- Official clients
vulnerabilities:
- Remote code execution
- Authentication bypass
- Authorization bypass
- Data exposure
- Encryption weaknesses
out_of_scope:
- Known issues
- Third-party services
- Best practice suggestions
- Social engineering
2. Submission Guidelines¶
Report Format¶
interface VulnerabilityReport {
metadata: {
reporter: string;
date: Date;
severity: string;
affected_version: string;
};
details: {
summary: string;
description: string;
steps_to_reproduce: string[];
impact: string;
};
proof_of_concept: {
code?: string;
screenshots?: string[];
logs?: string[];
};
}
Vulnerability Classification¶
1. Severity Levels¶
CVSS Scoring¶
severity_levels:
critical: # CVSS 9.0-10.0
description: "Immediate threat to core services"
examples:
- Remote code execution
- Complete system compromise
response_time: "24 hours"
high: # CVSS 7.0-8.9
description: "Significant security impact"
examples:
- Authentication bypass
- Sensitive data exposure
response_time: "48 hours"
medium: # CVSS 4.0-6.9
description: "Limited security impact"
examples:
- Cross-site scripting
- Information disclosure
response_time: "7 days"
low: # CVSS 0.1-3.9
description: "Minimal security impact"
examples:
- Best practice violations
- Minor configuration issues
response_time: "30 days"
2. Impact Assessment¶
Assessment Criteria¶
interface ImpactAssessment {
technical_impact: {
confidentiality: "none" | "partial" | "complete";
integrity: "none" | "partial" | "complete";
availability: "none" | "partial" | "complete";
};
business_impact: {
data_sensitivity: "low" | "medium" | "high";
financial_impact: "low" | "medium" | "high";
reputation_impact: "low" | "medium" | "high";
};
exploit_factors: {
complexity: "low" | "medium" | "high";
authentication: "none" | "single" | "multiple";
user_interaction: "none" | "required";
};
}
Response Process¶
1. Initial Response¶
Triage Process¶
triage_steps:
1: "Acknowledge receipt"
2: "Verify report completeness"
3: "Assess severity"
4: "Assign priority"
5: "Determine response team"
response_sla:
acknowledgment: "24 hours"
initial_assessment: "48 hours"
status_updates: "Every 72 hours"
2. Investigation¶
Investigation Process¶
interface InvestigationProcess {
steps: [
"Reproduce vulnerability",
"Identify root cause",
"Assess impact scope",
"Document findings",
];
documentation: {
technical_details: boolean;
affected_systems: string[];
mitigation_options: string[];
};
communication: {
internal: string[];
reporter: string[];
stakeholders: string[];
};
}
Remediation¶
1. Fix Development¶
Development Process¶
fix_process:
steps:
1: "Develop patch"
2: "Test fix"
3: "Security review"
4: "Prepare deployment"
requirements:
- No new vulnerabilities
- Backward compatible
- Performance impact assessed
- Documentation updated
2. Deployment¶
Deployment Strategy¶
interface DeploymentStrategy {
preparation: {
testing: string[];
rollback_plan: string[];
communication_plan: string[];
};
execution: {
steps: string[];
verification: string[];
monitoring: string[];
};
post_deployment: {
validation: string[];
documentation: string[];
lessons_learned: string[];
};
}
Disclosure Policy¶
1. Coordinated Disclosure¶
Disclosure Timeline¶
disclosure_process:
steps:
1: "Initial assessment"
2: "Fix development"
3: "Security advisory draft"
4: "Vendor notification"
5: "Public disclosure"
timeframes:
initial_response: "2 business days"
fix_development: "90 days"
grace_period: "14 days"
public_disclosure: "104 days"
2. Communication¶
Communication Channels¶
interface DisclosureCommunication {
channels: {
private: string[];
public: string[];
emergency: string[];
};
templates: {
acknowledgment: string;
status_update: string;
advisory: string;
};
stakeholders: {
internal: string[];
external: string[];
security: string[];
};
}
Recognition Program¶
1. Hall of Fame¶
Recognition Criteria¶
recognition:
eligibility:
- Valid vulnerability reported
- Following responsible disclosure
- Original finding
- In-scope submission
rewards:
- Public acknowledgment
- Security researcher badge
- Program points
- Swag or bounty
2. Rewards Program¶
Reward Structure¶
interface RewardProgram {
bounties: {
critical: {
range: string;
requirements: string[];
};
high: {
range: string;
requirements: string[];
};
medium: {
range: string;
requirements: string[];
};
low: {
range: string;
requirements: string[];
};
};
bonuses: {
quality_report: number;
quick_fix: number;
novel_finding: number;
};
}
Legal Safe Harbor¶
1. Safe Harbor Terms¶
Policy Terms¶
safe_harbor:
covered_activities:
- Security research
- Vulnerability testing
- Responsible disclosure
requirements:
- No damage to systems
- No data exfiltration
- No privacy violations
- Responsible testing
2. Legal Protection¶
Protection Scope¶
interface LegalProtection {
coverage: {
activities: string[];
limitations: string[];
exclusions: string[];
};
requirements: {
compliance: string[];
documentation: string[];
communication: string[];
};
assurances: {
legal_action: string;
cooperation: string;
confidentiality: string;
};
}
Contact Information¶
Security Contacts¶
Primary Channels¶
security_contacts:
email: security@aidddmap.com
pgp_key: "https://aidddmap.com/security/pgp-key.asc"
emergency: "+1-XXX-XXX-XXXX"
reporting_platforms:
bug_bounty: "https://hackerone.com/aidddmap"
security_form: "https://aidddmap.com/security/report"
encrypted_chat: "https://keybase.io/team/aidddmap_security"
Additional Resources¶
Need more information?
- Review our Security Policy
- Check Best Practices
- Join our Security Program
- Contact Security Team